Farsightedness. Things that are too close cannot be focused on clearly.
Step back. Lets talk Ohms law and "electronics people". Some systems level folks care only about microwave RF scattering parameters and smith charts. Others just use NEC tables vaguely derived from Ohms law but all that matters to them is passing inspection. Some consider Ohms law a dumbed down version of Maxwells equations for fools. Some, believe it or not, actually use Ohms law directly. There is no "right or wrong" other than grouping them all together as "electronics people".
In a similar way its pretty dumb to lump language designers, AI researchers, CRUD frontend devs, and generic code monkeys all under "programmer". The engineering field went thru a spinoff phase over a century ago where we no longer have "engineers" we have MechEng, ChemEng, EE, etc. I suspect in a hundred years it'll be considered humorously quaint that we used to lump all these vocations together under "programmer" even though they don't fit.
Step back. Lets talk Ohms law and "electronics people". Some systems level folks care only about microwave RF scattering parameters and smith charts. Others just use NEC tables vaguely derived from Ohms law but all that matters to them is passing inspection. Some consider Ohms law a dumbed down version of Maxwells equations for fools. Some, believe it or not, actually use Ohms law directly. There is no "right or wrong" other than grouping them all together as "electronics people".
In a similar way its pretty dumb to lump language designers, AI researchers, CRUD frontend devs, and generic code monkeys all under "programmer". The engineering field went thru a spinoff phase over a century ago where we no longer have "engineers" we have MechEng, ChemEng, EE, etc. I suspect in a hundred years it'll be considered humorously quaint that we used to lump all these vocations together under "programmer" even though they don't fit.