Any mail client (web, mobile, or desktop) that does NOT display the fully-qualified email address (FQEM) next to the "UTF-8" fancy name gets a hard PASS from me.
Such FQEM should ALWAYS display the fully-qualified email address.
I am looking at all the email clients so far. (Please correct me as I would love to be slightly wrong).
I think I can safely speak for all tired people that we are tired of spam.
This sounds like the type of thing FairEmail might have as an option. You could also have your email server change the fancy name to an ascii name so any client would display that.
But, it is still not a default always all fields of an email address that we all need to have to help end-users make an inform decision as to whether it is spam or not.
A reasonable compromise I've seen in some clients in the pass is to show just the display-name when the from address is in the address book and the FQEM along side it otherwise.
Showing the FQEM is of less help than one might think because people often scan over it in a list.
It is a new acronym term in attempt to break free of the spam industry stranglehold on spam.
You should also know who you are getting your email from instead of trusting other people putting in "their" name in the encoded-words (outside its addr-spec).
Such FQEM should ALWAYS display the fully-qualified email address.
I am looking at all the email clients so far. (Please correct me as I would love to be slightly wrong).
I think I can safely speak for all tired people that we are tired of spam.