So bizarre how app developers are always so polite and gracious when it comes to Apple. It's like even everyone is deathly afraid of saying anything that puts Apple in a negative light.
I can only imagine what this post would have looked like had it been say, Google in question.
Protection of investment. The developers have invested time and effort into their IOS software. The developers probably have the full suite of Apple hardware, phone, ipad, mbp, tv and all the software, configs, etc. They love using Apple. They love Apple the brand.
To say bad things about the brand that one has invested so much in actually would cause physical pain. To even consider leaving the brand and dumping such an investment puts many people off. They would rather protect themselves psychologically, and protect their investment. Thus we witness a polite and gracious love letter. It makes psychological sense.
It's weird how you assume that the only possible reason for a person to stay polite and classy in the face of adversity is that they're cringing suck-ups.
There is no negative light here... this is a capability/feature that makes sense at the OS level. On desktops you have access to the deepest parts of the system, but on mobile, things need to be more secure.
Apple's done nothing wrong, and given Apple's history of implementing these kinds of features, then opening them up to developers in the next release, being polite when asking them to open them up is appropriate.
For instance, it used to be that only Apple apps could control the brightness of the screen. Apple opened that up to all apps several years ago, and now many apps use it.
Apple's just introduced new technology that would be useful for this app developer, and in a way, they are effectively enabling this kind of app-- and when they open it up in the next release (possibly iOS 10, since this is a feature introduced in the iOS 9.3 interim release) it will be stable and usable more broadly.
The combative attitude many on HN have towards apple is more about being in the Google camp and seeing them as the enemy, than about Apple doing wrong by anyone (Yeas yeas, I know they take %30 of transactions, but that's an improvement over the %80 that previous generations of mobile software developers had to give up.. and other stores take a similar cut. etc.)
Not a good example, if you actually read the article, though. The app dev was clearly trying to provoke Apple in any way he could; for instance, by raising the price of his game to $400.
You mean "persecuting", btw, and not "prosecuting".
I have several friends now who don't have a laptop or don't use it - they exclusively use a tablet/phone outside of work. They'd definitely be impacted by malware with access to all their data and communications, not to mention the ability to rack up massive monthly bills.
I know the grugq says not to root Android for maximum security, but I prefer to have the toggle. I don't like this continual removal of features from phones and I strive to have the same level of access that I had on my Nokia N900 - but it has to be an informed choice.
There has to be a middle ground somewhere between Android's "Cryptolocker.apk was successfully installed!" and Apple's "thou shalt not covet thine neighbour's underground app store on penalty of death".
I can only imagine what this post would have looked like had it been say, Google in question.