I know very little about lawyering, but I could imagine a UW-alum or Seattle-area lawyer advising pro bono bc of generosity or good publicity on a very newsworthy case
Anyone on here friends with a UW-alum or Seattle-area lawyer who might be interested but doesn’t read HN?
It's very common in the UK. The most visible part of the unions is running social activities, often bars and events, but they can also provide legal advice to their members.
Not undergraduates. The "student union" in this context is 100% a social entity.
Graduate students sometimes are part of unions, but usually only if they're also employed by the university (somebody paying full tuition for an MBA probably isn't in a union, but a doctoral student teaching or doing research might be).
Undergrads doing part-time work at the university to pay bills (dining hall, bookstore, etc) could be, in theory, but probably aren't.
Graduate students (who teach, do research, and some administrative tasks for the university) occasionally do. What American schools usually have is a “student government” which is approximately 90% roleplaying as elected officials, and the remaining 10% is deciding which banquets they should host themselves to spend the small budget the university gives them.
Even if this student isn't a member, the local graduate student union (https://www.uaw4121.org/) would probably be a useful ally. All TAs are in the bargaining unit, and UW CSE has _a lot_ of undergrad TAs, so I wouldn't even be surprised if this student is a present (or former) member.
Possibly this is not the actual dress code? Or I'm missing something.
3.a. The following is acceptable for men players, captains, head of delegation.
-- Suits, ties, dressy pants, trousers, jeans...
3.b. The following is NOT acceptable for men players, captains, head of delegation.
-- Beach-wear slips, profanity and nude or semi-nude pictures printed on shirts, torn pants or jeans...
Here is a short example that came up for me last week.
I had a set of documents I wanted to classify according a taxonomy that is well known (so it is exists in the training data of all the major llm models I tested)
If I have prompt like, `You are an expert classification system. Using the Classification Approach Foo, consider the following and output the category in JSON format, such as {"class":"bar"} `
This works ok, but it works much better if I tell it to output {"class":"bar", "reason": "baz"} and improved with some other approaches like adding "related_class" or "parent_category" which would otherwise be redundant.
Also including some few-shot examples helped, but the biggest benefit came from the "reason" field. Trying justification or other synonyms seems to produce the same output.
Have you tested moving the "reason" field before the "class" field? That may encourage better CoT instead of having the model justify the class after it already picked it. Anecdotally, I saw a 5% boost in performance from a NER system from having the model output the entity's class at the end rather than the beginning.
Speaking only for myself these ideas are a combination of things I've seen scanning new papers and informal discussions with other people working in the area. Feel free to shoot me an e-mail though, maybe I can point you somewhere more specific.
Edit: The "verbosity sink" name is inspired by the idea from the paper below although they're not actually at all the same thing.
I was in the S12 batch. A couple years later we were demonstrably failing. I emailed the general YC advice line or something similar with a question, and pg responded with a thoughtful comment that was genuinely useful
I don’t think there’s any chance he saw any economic value in us, he took that time because he cared about startups and well-meaning failures like us
It’s a small thing, yes, but I’ve always thought it said a lot about him
Agreed. In a similar vein, when our YC company was failing I had a great call with Jessica Livingston, and looking back it was purely moral support and not anything economically motivated.
Right now it’s just what i got up in a hurry last year, covers Seattle area only. Next year will cover SF and LA at least (and have a lot more features).
The data is quite granular (each row is one batch, say x age group at y location with z theme) and I do a lot of structuring data with prompts and now OpenAI’s Structured Outputs. I think the data gathering would have made this cost prohibitive otherwise.
I’m not engineer by training or work experience, so this also would have been impossible for me to build without ChatGPT’s help coding.
“The memo cites a recent study, published in the journal of the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE), looking at Washington, D.C.’s implementation of no-turn-on-red restrictions at 100 intersections in 2019. Driver-to-driver conflicts were reduced by 97%, and vehicle-pedestrian conflicts were reduced by 92% following the installation of consistent no-turn-on-red (NTOR) signage.”
The Jesuit high school I went to had a class “Jesus of History, Christ of Faith”, that looked at what we do and don’t know about a historical Jesus (at least as of ~2000).
I’m sure I’d had my doubts before, but that class convinced me to stop believing for good.
Gotta hand it to the Jesuits for teaching that class though; all these years later and I still have a lot of respect for that order
The “learn to pronounce” made it seem pretty clear this was just copypasta, without any effort put into editing. The caps presumably just came from the dictionary’s styling. In this case indicating a more specific meaning in a particular field (theology).
Like glaugh, I appreciated the definition of a new-to-me word appearing inline :)
Clavinova digital piano! I hated piano as a kid, largely bc of the lesson style (and plan on trying Suzuki method with my kids).
I’ve played guitar (poorly) for years and I’m shocked with how (relatively) easy it is on piano to do fun improvisation or learn songs I love (Radiohead’s Videotape to start, now trying Piano Man)
And digital means I can turn down the volume when kids are sleeping, use as a midi controller, etc. I’m not audiophilic enough to really care about the tonal difference between it and a real piano, I really can’t tell
Anyone on here friends with a UW-alum or Seattle-area lawyer who might be interested but doesn’t read HN?