Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Helicopters are really expensive, and require a lot of manpower.

>"Had we had not seen him then, the drone would have seen him a few minutes later since he was in the search area we were given to look at. If nothing else, the drone helped us cover a huge area in a short amount of time that would have taken many volunteers hours to search."

I think that the cheap and quick aspects of drones are really important here.




This. Exactly this is why it's significant.

Even a small piston powered Robin helo is around $500 to operate per hour[1], and the smallest turbine powered ones are going to be around that figure just for the fuel: ~500 lb/h fuel consumption [2][3], JetA at > $6 / gallon [4].

So for one hour helo ops, you can purchase 2-3 parrot drones [5].

[1] http://www.aneclecticmind.com/2013/09/12/why-i-charge-545hou...

[2] http://www.turbokart.com/about_arrius.htm

[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurocopter_Colibri

[4] http://www2.jetaviation.com/index.php/jet/bedford/fuel

[5] http://www.amazon.com/Parrot-AR-Drone-Quadricopter-Controlle...


But you need to factor efficiency into that. If the top speed of the chopper is 100mph, versus 10mph for the drone. Then you can cover a much larger area quickly, furthermore a helicopter can stay up longer and has much greater range. So it's not enough to say a heli costs x/per hour therefore drones. Kind of like saying trash trucks are expensive, therefore we should replace them with wheel barrows.

From the article: We were asked to search a large area of farmland with the drone. I covered three-quarters of it using three batteries, and the last quarter was a little too far for me to get good first-person view reception

Landing to change batteries every couple of minutes, is a serious blow to efficiency.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: