Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I was a huge Flickr user from 2006-2009, but the service stayed in 2006, and so I moved on. The new changes are very exciting, but I still have one huge gripe. For a service about to turn 10 years old, being unable to change my URL is a deal breaker:

I registered my URL in high school, and now I'm starting my masters. My photos have improved, and so has my online identity.

I'm considering just switching to a new account, but the situation gave me no faith that Flickr was worth the effort. I look forward to a similar post when Flickr overhauls the backend.




I have this same gripe (about HN too, I suppose). Flickr claims that it's a philosophical thing - that URLs shouldn't change, so the username I chose when I first registered years ago should invariably be what I'm associated with for the rest of my life.

They likely do have the technical ability - when you initially register, your URL is represented by internal IDs (like 1234567@Z01), and you then choose your 'friendly' url. So it doesn't seem like a stretch that they could extend this to allow changes.


I understand the philosophy of keeping URLs active, but this is taking it to a new extreme. How about changing URLs every... 5 years or something ridiculous. I mean, they allow me to delete my account and that would kill URLs, so if it's between deletion or changing, what is the difference?




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: