> This judge did actually rule that it was "arbitrary and capricious".
That's not a policy judgement is a procedural one. Its not "it should not be done", but "the FTC did not do what is substantively required in assessing the facts and applying the law".
I'm not saying it is right, I am saying "arbitrary and capricious" is specifically a procedural finding in federal administrative law.
That's not a policy judgement is a procedural one. Its not "it should not be done", but "the FTC did not do what is substantively required in assessing the facts and applying the law".
I'm not saying it is right, I am saying "arbitrary and capricious" is specifically a procedural finding in federal administrative law.