> Human intelligence is not benchmarked by its lowest common denominators (just like how we don't judge LLM's on the basis of tiny 100M parameter models).
Indeed, but we do also catalogue our cognitive biases — kinda the human version of what are now called hallucinations when LLMs do them. (When Stable Diffusion does it, it's "oh god the fingers").
It's worth caring about both strengths and weaknesses.
Indeed, but we do also catalogue our cognitive biases — kinda the human version of what are now called hallucinations when LLMs do them. (When Stable Diffusion does it, it's "oh god the fingers").
It's worth caring about both strengths and weaknesses.