Just because the bank didn't reverse the transaction doesn't mean the disabled p... | Hacker News

Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

login

hollerith 7 months ago | parent | context | favorite | on: Inside the "3 billion people" national public data...

Just because the bank didn't reverse the transaction doesn't mean the disabled person can't sue the caretaker and doesn't mean a prosecutor can't charge the caretaker.

Eji1700 7 months ago [–]

Doesn’t mean the victimized party is super unlikely to get their money back, and any they do get will be months or years after the fact

Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!
Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact