For fun, I wrote some Javascript that will numeronymize text, but it will also "de-numeronymize" it again by converting the result back into random words that also match. (if a match can't be found, it returns the original word, and unlike the article, it doesn't handle non-English characters)
https://www.timpark.org/n10e-s2e-t2t/
I dislike numeronyms. They may be shorter to type, but unlike acronyms, where the acronym itself is a valid pronounciation, numeronyms cannot usually be pronounced. The only way to know how is to know what the original word is, so you have to ask every time.
Communication requires thought and input from both sides - if I use a numeric abbreviation with someone who is unfamiliar with it, I am communicating badly.
I think where we differ is that I see such abbreviations as no worse than any other - TLAs (three letter acronyms) can also be as impenetrable.
What?!?! I have never heard anyone pronounce these terms in such a ludicrous fashion, and it’s not because I don’t have exposure I do a fair amount of work in this space.
Or the writer could keep their writing more accessible by using the word accessibility, understood by hundreds of millions of people, instead of some meme term understood by maybe thousands.
Indeed, it is strictly worse than an abbreviation made by removing the medial part, e.g. intl'n or acc'y, because numeronyms only keep the first and last character.
I shit you not, the reason I have heard that they are more "accessible" is because the words that get shortened are hard to spell.
I assume the real reason is because each of these indecipherable glyphs is a s8h* to identify the "cool" and "woke" (not in the US politics sense but in a more general sense of the word) crowd from the rest.
* If you don't know this word, you're not in the club
Fowler's Law on Unicode: There's always another bug, you just haven't found it yet.
Dr Drang's script counts the number of _characters_ not the number of _glyphs_. This matters because there's more than one way to represent é: Either just as unicode character \x{e9} ("NFC") or as a combination of "e" and the combining character that adds the accent ("NFD")
For example for "léon" this prints out "l3n" for me.
I spent some time staring at l4h, after quickly reading o4e as 'obese' on the way there. I suppose this might be a good Freudian slip generation scheme?
I'm loving the perl one liners. I fear its a dying art!
Tangent:
I worked at a large financial news site for a number of years.
One of our best engineers spun up an "a11y" sub team. As it was quite involved and they went team to team doing things, I assume it was some sort of dev tool initiative.
It was only after I left and I was describing it as the "ally" team that I was told what it meant.
Its like "banal" its only when you say it out load amongst (hopefully) friends do you realise that you've not got it quite right....
> e14n -> "Andreesen Horowitz" is not a typo, it is a bit of an easter egg/joke (Sorry, I can't help myself.):
> "e14n" has recently shown up in social meda as shorthand for @pluralistic's "enshittification" coinage. Andreesen Horowitz often refers to themselves using a numeronym: "a16z".
Ex: "accessibility localization internationalization multilingualization globalization" becomes "a11y l10n i18n m17n g11n" becomes "applicability locomutation intercrystallization metaphenylenediamin gastrocnemian"