Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The problem with codecs is that you basically need to double-encode/store etc. until you have effectively 100% support in your visitors’ browsers, and that’s uneconomical for all but the largest sites.

As the maintainer of Chrome (and to some extent even all browsers based on Blink), Google currently really does have the power to kill web standards, especially those that have a (less efficient) alternative.

This would be true even if the majority of people would be willing to change browsers over an image codec, which they’re almost certainly not.




Storage is cheap.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: