Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I'm not sure how you reconcile acknowledging the reality of companies not being able to make payroll for two weeks and also calling it a "canard" in back to back sentences. A "fake canard" would be a double negative by the way ;)

If you reread the thread and the context of what I was responding to it was the OP stating "It's not clear anyone would have lost anything at all ..."

Perhaps you are well-off but losing a pay check for couple of weeks has real consequences for lots of people.




> Perhaps you are well-off but losing a pay check for couple of weeks has real consequences for lots of people.

They're arguing that companies could already make payroll just fine with access to half their balance. A 100% guarantee was not necessary.


If your payroll plus all other outgoing expenses was greater than $250K then no you would not be able to "make payroll just fine." This is simple math. Arguing against basic math is absurd.


I said half their balance. I didn't say anything about 250k. Please reread the comment thread.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: