Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

This is all true, except for the user data part. If Google were a billboard company that tried hard to get people to look at its billboard, that's fine. If they're constantly observing by scanning emails, calendars, browsing and location data that's another.



Data collection is standard procedure as well. Most ISP's keeps a record of every website you visit, most net providers keeps a record of all locations your phone has visited etc. Only difference is that most companies just sells these to some data broker like Equifax or similar while Google uses it for their own purposes.


Not for billboard companies.


They would if they could. Billboards can't so they don't, but businesses has monetized user data as long as it has been possible.

Read this article for example about Target identifying people who were possibly pregnant to send ads and offers about baby supplies to them: https://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/19/magazine/shopping-habits....

Google didn't do any innovations at all in this space, they just had more data and didn't share that data with data brokers so they could do more with it.


Yes I understand other companies do this to some extent. That's not relevant to my point.


Honestly, I'd rather look at subtle Google ads than the large, brightly-colored eye-sores that span our landscapes selling adult book stores, fast food, and Jesus.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: