Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Firefox abandoning the more powerful XUL to web extensions resulted in a lot of extensions going away because there are not useable APIs. On the other hand, I would feel relatively safer to install a web extensions than a XUL nowadays because they are pretty well contained with permissions.



I miss XUL. Yes, you gave over complete control to the author of the plugin. But with a properly functioning rating and reporting system, bad extensions would be flagged and removed before you were statistically likely to use them. Also, I think that allowing users to open a "banking mode" with extensions disabled would be better than removing user choice entirely. But considering that browsers are quite literally a business, and you need funding to continue to develop one, all browsers had to remove user choice in order to not get hit by a "firefox is insecure" smear campaign.


Some did come back over time though as additional APIs were added from what was there initially: epubreader and DownThenAll! being a couple examples.


> additional APIs [...] DownThenAll!

DownThenAll! (or download managers in general) are still rather severely crippled, though – they can only download into the official OS "Downloads" folder, they can't skip files that already exist in the target directory...




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: