> but several companies use Polyaxon with other tools like Kubeflow or it can be used with MetaFlow for the pipelines part.
Isn't that what the parent you are replying to is talking about with "Right now you have to cobble this together from different tools that are all pretty suboptimal."
Our tool provides several solutions, however, we do not force users to use all of these abstractions. It's very important for us that our product is interoperable with the rest of the ecosystem.
If a company is already using a pipelining tool, a visualization tool, or a data management tool, Polyaxon will work and integrate with those tools seamlessly.
That being said, and I fully understand where the OP is coming from, there are several companies not interested in managing several solutions and all the complexity that comes with the infrastructure, deployment, maintenance, upgrades, user facing clients, authn/authz, permissions... Polyaxon provides the right abstractions for covering the experimentation and the automation phase.
Isn't that what the parent you are replying to is talking about with "Right now you have to cobble this together from different tools that are all pretty suboptimal."