Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The word angrier implies there is an objective way to measure anger. There isn't. Ask Howard Dean.



>is an objective way to measure anger

Number of incidents where John McCain has been on camera/near reporters and been angry: many.

Number of incidents where Barack Obama has been on camera/near reporters and been angry: none.

It's objective enough for these purposes.


The measurement doesn't need to be objective. If you agree with the journalist, then this statement supports his general argument. If you disagree, it doesn't. That's all.

Now, there are ways to measure anger objectively:

Cortisol in bloodstream; volume of voice; Blood pressure; etc.

In fact, the amount of cortisol in the bloodstream is a rather all-encompassing measurement that works as a pretty good proxy for how angry you are, even though it is technically your level of stress.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: