> or the test was a change detector test not a functional test.
Or the test was flat out broken and was testing implementation detail minutiae that don't really matter. As in, in a strange limbo between unit and functional tests. I've seen this many times.
> It seems like OP has never worked on a large system
That's an extreme logic leap + ad hominem in one. You got that from just one article?
Or the test was flat out broken and was testing implementation detail minutiae that don't really matter. As in, in a strange limbo between unit and functional tests. I've seen this many times.
> It seems like OP has never worked on a large system
That's an extreme logic leap + ad hominem in one. You got that from just one article?