As written, sure. But making that statement into a claim that's comprehensible to a general audience is distinct from just claiming something completely unrelated. Notice that in my statement the CA has nothing to do with this traffic and whether or not it's intercepted. Because they don't.

Part of a journalist's job is to find a way to summarise an inevitably complicated story _without_ in the process making it into a completely different story. "Bilbo the wizard stole a magical ring" is not a good summary of The Hobbit, because it is wrong. The wizard isn't named Bilbo and that isn't what that story is about even though maybe it's important for other reasons.