if you don't code, don't try to teach yourself and code for your startup. partner with someone who is great at it. programming is an art & science and takes years to get good at.
Completely agree. I dislike reading articles that insist if you have an idea you can just pick up programming, design or development and build it yourself. That may be true in the strict sense of having something simple to explain your idea, but it pales in comparison to the work that can be created by someone who has talent and years of experience. Also, its going to be throw away work. If your idea has is worthwhile and gains traction then you're going to need to have someone rebuild everything you've done anyway. Why waste that time? Partner with someone who can execute the product from day one.
I agree and disagree. I'm not a developer, and I know that it's not worth for me at the time trying to become a good developers, that's why I try to hire great developers or partner with them. But at the same time, I wanted (and I did) learn the basics of PHP first and Ruby/RoR later, not because I plan to build things on my own, but because even if you just collaborate with developers (I'm a designer/front-end guy), it's really important to understand the technology and the logic behind it. Sure, to drive a car you don't need to know how the engine works, but if you do, you'll immediately know when something is wrong so that you can take it to shop to get it checked.
I agree that it is important to be able to communicate effectively with anyone who has a technical background. Often that does mean having a basic knowledge of fundamentals of a language, etc. My point was really the mindset that you can just pickup a book and in 30 days be able to build your dream application and Viola! Not so much.
When I look back, I've been programming since I was 9, that's 15 years. That's very similar to most of the best hackers I know. Obviously you could cut down on that time when you start older due to maturity but not by much.
Learning to program well takes a long time but the concept of 15 years experience in your 20s is foreign to most people.
Didling around with qBasic when your 9 doesn't exactly qualify as a year of experience in my book, any more than didling around with crayons at the age of 5 would qualify as a year of experience for a designer.
I think it is worth coding the working mvp , even though you know that it is going to be re-done if you take off. This will help one to demonstrate his seriousness and something visual to show when he/she pitches to developer/co-founder instead of pitching a random idea.
Developers have their pick of non-technical co-founders. It's a lot harder to approach someone with just "an idea." What are you offering in return? How do you contribute to a startup in those initial months? Sure, I've read plenty of posts on what non-technical co-founders can do in a startup - lots! But, it pales in comparison to the bread and butter of a startup: building a product.
If you're looking to build the next Google or Wolfram Mathematica, find an expert or 2.
The guys at SeatGeek built their initial product - a crude prototype but decent enough to promote at TechCrunch. Now, they're funded and growing. They were not programmers, but they needed something and they didn't have the resources to find someone to build it. Coding is a bottleneck for a lot of non-technical folks. Do what you got to do to get through it, scotch tape and all.
But clearly this isn't your forte, so why not find someone who can focus on that area. That leaves you to manage product development, vision and to test the work that's been done to create a product. I'm just not of the mindset that doing something twice is the right way to go. Especially when speed is a factor.
The problem with this is what other value can you bring to a prototype stage project if you aren't doing do any of the coding? You do need some coding knowledge to make a/b testing optimization, SEO, or other marketing strategies of value.
This is false. VWO lets you do A/B testing without code. SEO is about making content and asking for links. Marketing online requires math, but certainly not any code.
Well, I'm mainly referring to the very early prototype stage, where you spend as little as you can. If you have some early funding (either self funding or family) then you can use VWO instead of a free A/B testing framework (A/Bingo for example).
You still need to know how to manipulate some of the front end and back end code to show the user your A/B tests. On page SEO at least requires some knowledge of HTML. You're right about marketing such as adwords and LTV not requiring any code though.
partially agree, i do believe to become a good programmer takes years but today tech help you to do programming more easily, like PHP and its frameworks. So it depends on how hard the problem you are solving is. Someone can pick up decent html/css lessons in shorter time and build a prototype, he then can hire other later when profit.
hire a good startup law firm (i like gunderson) and get standardized incorporation, vesting etc docs. it's worth it. (but try to only pay $5K or so with promise to pay more later when you get funding etc).
Should this really cost $5K+ or more to get standardized docs? It should be possible to get high quality legal documentation necessary for starting your company for a fair amount less, but maybe I'm wrong. Do others here have experience on this?
Great question. That 5K will seem cheap when the lawyer you work with starts introducing you to angel investors. The valley is ALL about connections. Everybody here is a full time network-er. The job title, such as 'Lawyer', is just something that goes on a business card ;)
That is a very, very sad thing to say. I live in the valley as well, and I am not a full-time schmoozer. I suppose that makes me a chump in your book. Once a person's (or systems's) focus shifts to schmoozing instead of the original reason you became a lawyer, programmer, etc, it's probably too late to stop the decline.
Some things can only be done with many people. Connections help. But that's quite a different thing from "I am ALL about connections". Wouldn't it be better to be ALL about your customers, or your real passion?
Actually, it's a great thing! Since you hate schmoozing (I do too), this is good news - there are other people out there that will do some of it for you (or, more accurately, give you access to the fruits of years of schmoozing). Every investor/mentor/lawyer you add to your team means more network that you didn't have to schmooze to earn.
Gunderson is a fine law firm but probably one of the most expensive ones around. I doubt they will do anything for you if you do not give them 5K at least.
If you want to save money, you should hack the system and use a start-up lawyer as well. By start up lawyer, I do not mean one that specializes in start-ups but one that is a startup him/her self. I.e. one that has his/her own practice.*
You have to understand that those top law firms have a strict up or out policy so they routinely get rid of most of their associates. Basically, if you cannot make partner, you are usually out eventually. And almost no-one makes partner. So there are many capable lawyers with top training that leave these firms every year. If you are a bit savvy you can get a lawyer that is the same caliber as the usual top law firm lawyer but will charge you less and might even do better work because he/she is not working 16 hour days.
*After I wrote this I realized that a law practice would not qualify as a start up under the pg definition because it is not scalable, but you get my point.
When did "startup" become synonymous with social internet site that will take years to make any money? I know I'm on HN; my point is that there are startups in all kinds of fucking fields for which this advice is absolutely useless.
That said, not enough CEOs/product people have an understanding of programming and what it means for business.
I totally agree. These suggestions seemed to work for this guy in his scenario. This maybe will apply to someone else, but these shouldn't be steps for you to start your own business. I'm part owner of a landscaping company and hardly any of these apply.
These are all good suggestions, but they are all in addition to, not at the expense of building a great product, which is a necessary, but not sufficient condition.
For example, last night I had a choice between a networking event and some critical work on my software. The work won, as it should.
I look forward to the time when I won't have to make so many tough decisions about how to spend my time. Until that time comes, work on the product comes first.
You had a choice and you picked coding rather than go out. Once, it's fine. The problem, with the many developer friends I have, is that very quickly they settle in a routine of never going to events, because there is always one more line of code to write.
That's where you need discipline. As I wrote a year ago, if you never go to events, set your goal to two events a month. If you go to two per month, set your goal to once a week. That should be enough. You can read the long version at http://blog.fairsoftware.net/2009/07/09/good-programmers-don..., in the "Four Step Recovery Program" section.
He stress on Networking. I know networking is useful, but most of the time I find it a waste of time. You can simply find a problem, figure out a solution and build it with a partner. Then charge for it, either online (SaaS) or offline (uISV). Use Google Adwords to target your audience and keep at it if you are profitable.
No Blogging, Twittering, reading Tech Blogs or all that crap. Just focus on your product and give value to your customers.
There's some selection bias here: we're reading this guy's blog not because he's successful with startups, but because he's successful with startups and concentrates on maintaining an online presence, networking, etc.
Whatever happened to offering a good or service that people are willing to pay for? Is this really what makes a good business? Absorbing information from "all tech blogs everyday" so that you can regurgitate it on your blog, on your twitter, and at networking meetings?
This blog post reads more like a list of instructions on how to be the prettiest girl at the startup scene dance. These ideas are fine if the people writing the blogs and mingling at networking meetings are your potential customers, but I think most of us would be better served by getting away from all of that to talk to the people outside of the echo chamber. You know, the ones with wallets that MBAs like this guy only come in contact with when they're poring over a spreadsheet.
I agree that i takes awhile to become a good developer, but you need teach yourself front end stuff at least. That's unless you already have a bunch of developer friends willing/wanting to be apart & turn your idea in a reality.
There are so many posts here and experiences (my own) where someone is looking to create an idea but they do not have the friends or the ooomph to convince others to join him/her to build their idea or start-up. If you fall into such category go out and learn html, css & photoshop and hire a developer. It will take you longer but you'll gain a skill, have better control of your vision and most important your idea will become a reality.
I question the the steady diet of TechCrunch, mashable, etc. Too some extent that is just startup masturbation. I wonder if better advice is to just not read those things for awhile and focus on your product and your potential customers.
This might be a naive question, but is there any empirical evidence showing that blogging/tweeting actually helps your startup? Is this supposed to be for self-motivation or getting attention?
Completely agree. I dislike reading articles that insist if you have an idea you can just pick up programming, design or development and build it yourself. That may be true in the strict sense of having something simple to explain your idea, but it pales in comparison to the work that can be created by someone who has talent and years of experience. Also, its going to be throw away work. If your idea has is worthwhile and gains traction then you're going to need to have someone rebuild everything you've done anyway. Why waste that time? Partner with someone who can execute the product from day one.