> The issue was that this was being used to load uninspectible code onto users' devices, which sooner or later may have led to a bunch of users installing malware.
It is entirely reasonable to prioritize malware above circadian rhythms. (And e.g. Apple’s response is predictable.) This is just not the same as the priorities of the Flux developers.
I feel like you are deliberately missing my previous point. Do you understand what their motives and reasoning process were?
Can you see why I think their practice has nothing to do with their likelihood of distorting scientific research about vision or sleep science?
Relating the two seems to me like seeing a pedestrian crossing the street in the middle of the block and guessing that they probably don’t tip restaurant servers.
It is entirely reasonable to prioritize malware above circadian rhythms. (And e.g. Apple’s response is predictable.) This is just not the same as the priorities of the Flux developers.
I feel like you are deliberately missing my previous point. Do you understand what their motives and reasoning process were? Can you see why I think their practice has nothing to do with their likelihood of distorting scientific research about vision or sleep science?
Relating the two seems to me like seeing a pedestrian crossing the street in the middle of the block and guessing that they probably don’t tip restaurant servers.