Note that re: Kyllo v United States, trust in any specific manufacturer is irrelevant. The SCOTUS ruled that use of a technology - not a product - requires a warrant when it is "is not in general public use".
The Kyllo case involved two federal agents that used their own thermal imaging camera to search a house for the presence of people and grow lights.
Note that re: Kyllo v United States, trust in any specific manufacturer is irrelevant. The SCOTUS ruled that use of a technology - not a product - requires a warrant when it is "is not in general public use".
The Kyllo case involved two federal agents that used their own thermal imaging camera to search a house for the presence of people and grow lights.