It's hard to believe that we still don't understand the cracking-knuckles mechanism. The effect is so large!
Pardon the cruelty of my line of thought here... but do other animals exhibit the same effect? And could some intrusive measurements be done inserting probes into the affected areas, possibly damaging the flesh but revealing data? Even if there might be ethical concerns with such experiments today, I'm surprised that they were not carried out in decades past.
I suppose it's not the highest priority research...
The medical profession is like a bunch of garage mechanics that are working on the most complicated, convoluted, and fussy car ever with no manual. They are still reverse engineering our bodies. They are still discovering organs in the human body. (https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/31/health/new-organ-intersti...)
Snapping Shrimp have a claw designed to produce a cavitation bubble (in seawater, not within the joint itself), which collapses to generate one of the loudest sounds in the ocean.
I'm pretty sure mantis shrimp (stomatopods) do the same thing. Apparently they're capable of smashing through the glass of aquariums if not properly reinforced.
I mean there has to be SOMETHING in there that is forming, and then being removed, right? I can't immediately crack my fingers again. There has to be a period of time, and it does appear the longer I wait, the larger the crack(within limits).
I agree that there must be something forming there. I can often 'feel' that a joint can be popped, prior to actually doing so, and sometimes, it seems, without even flexing the joint.
You actually can't select text on the nytimes website? Instead they add a functionality where double clicking changes the font size. Looks like a bored designer is at work here...
Are you using a touchscreen computer? There's a bug on the NYT site with Touchscreen computers that disables highlighting text on Firefox. It's been bugging me forever, on my Surface Pro.
Pardon the cruelty of my line of thought here... but do other animals exhibit the same effect? And could some intrusive measurements be done inserting probes into the affected areas, possibly damaging the flesh but revealing data? Even if there might be ethical concerns with such experiments today, I'm surprised that they were not carried out in decades past.
I suppose it's not the highest priority research...