The animation is confusing...is one trip to the end and back the 1B iterations? I thought maybe they were counting up and once the slowest reached the end they would all stop but that didn't seem to be it. Maybe if it did (and there was a counter on each showing how many bounces they made), it'd be a little more clear.
Looks like they are just bouncing back and forth at relative speeds to each other; the speed of each ball is all that matters. I also found this diagram confusing at first.
Not natively. There is other firmware out there, though, that allows such functionality. Depending on where you live, it may be illegal to even try, though, hence the native firmware locking out such use (you can record or visualize but not save/replay).
I don’t know exactly how the rolling key works but wouldn’t it be kind of like having a secret stored in the key that’s needed to generate the next code? If it’s designed properly, recording a few thousand codes shouldn’t tell you anything about the next code, just like you can’t deduce private keys by looking at a few thousand encrypted files. I have no clue if that’s really how it works, so I would be happy to be corrected if my mental model is wrong here.
That phrase is doing a lot of heave lifting there...
(This is only what I've read, but as i understand it many rolling code keys can be broken by recording three button presses while the keyfob is out of range of the car, then brute forcing the seed.)
Basically yeah. You'd need millions of replays to even have a chance. Cracking basic wifi back in the day required a couple days worth of sniffed packets. I'd imagine this is similar, if there is in fact a way to do it.
Probably as enforceable as any other EULA. Windows surely has similar language. I'd guess that somewhere buried deep in the agreements, or somewhere, it says they can audit your usage somehow. Does it ever happen? I'd be curious to know.
Windows doesn’t have similar language. Not directly, anyway. Depending on the edition of Windows you purchase and how your overall license agreement works, you get anywhere from zero to ten VM licenses per paid Windows license.
I’m omitting a few details for brevity (MS licensing is nuts when you get into the weeds).
Qt 5.15 at this point has been out for 4 years, already out of "normal" commercial LTS and will reach the end of extended commercial LTS next year. They don't have any incentive to do this kind of change.
Agreed. Interesting that Yahoo was your choice. I may try it as well (have experimented with DDG and Bing a bit, but haven't used Yahoo since it was the only option back in the day).
Off topic (sorry), but has the quality of searches been on a steady decline over the last year or two? If I'm not just imagining things, wonder if it is because they changed the algo or if there is too much noise for the algo to work well anymore. Frustrating nonetheless...
Disregarding search results, it's been impossible for me to learn over all these years when it will actually start listening to me. Unpredictable time, can't count on the beep, can't count on the lights... it used to be instant on, and I miss that.
By relying on the default keepalive limit, NGINX prevents this type of attack. Creating additional connections to circumvent this limit exposes bad actors via standard layer 4 monitoring and alerting tools.
However, if NGINX is configured with a keepalive that is substantially higher than the default and recommended setting, the attack may deplete system resources.
In the article one of the attendants says "I hit stop on Pump 3 and nothing happens" so they are at least seeing the pump is on and running. Whatever is happening must be either locking the attendant out or is leaving the attendants machine in a bad state with the pump running switch "on" so to speak.
I wonder if it's actually NFC. It'd be interesting to see what a Flipper Zero would come up with.
Agree, sounds like some kind of poorly-protected function has been discovered that's putting the pump into a "maintenance" or "test" mode where it will dispense fuel without a prepay having been completed.
It's the mistranslation of room-temperature superconductivity.
"super islands" is likely translated from 超岛 which sounds the same as 超导 (superconductivity). I have no idea how 室温 (room-temperature) became extraterrestrial, must be extraordinarily bad speech to text model.
edit: could be 室温 (shi4wen1) -> shi4wai4 -> 室外(outdoors)/世外(out of this world) -> extraterrestrial
Let's break one rule at the time, please. I don't think I'm quite ready for heavy elements that are long lived, either at room temperature or any other, and even less so if they turn out to be non-radioactive...
Interesting nonetheless.