If anyone is trying to run these models (DeepSeek-R1-xxx) on LM Studio you need to update to 0.3.7 Was trying all day to find the error in the Jinja template and was able to make them work by switching to manual then in my email see they added support in the latest version. It was a good learning experience have never really needed to fiddle with any of those settings as most the time they just work. If you did fiddle with the prompt hitting the trash can will restore the original and once you upgrade the Jinja parsing errors go away. Cheers!
I have not used Mixxx nor do I have it installed, but might download to check it out.
But.....
If its always in a SQLite DB you should be able to use DB Browser for SQLite to inspect the DB Schema and then write a bash/python (whatever) script to pull the info out.
RESULTS=$(sqlite-utils "data.db" "
SELECT
song,
artist,
duration,
FROM my_table
WHERE song = 'CURRENT';")
RESULTS=$(sqlite3 data.db <<EOF
SELECT
song,
artist,
duration,
FROM my_table
WHERE song = 'CURRENT';
EOF
)
I have no idea what the schema looks like but those are just some examples of how straightforward it might be. Run it on CRON (whatever) update as needed.
https://cronitor.io/guides/python-cron-jobs
Once you have the Schema an LLM could most likely do the rest if you are not a programmer, but still need someone to get it added to the site.
Yep converting to Llama arch definitely makes accessibility much better - also many fast LLM serving libraries normally support Llama, so it makes it easier to port and use!
Most sites will have a confirmation once you click the link that includes the browser version and IP address. I have seen that info only in the email itself too with no confirmation afterwords, but not for some time. Have never seen one that is just a link with nothing else that once clicked allows the other device in but supposes could be implemented that way.
The article itself is about not making them the only option (which is fair), and the OP says if they do it should login the device which originally made the request (which I agree). If the implementation is just an email with only a link, no other information with no confirmation (yes, it's fine to let this device in), then I would have to agree with you it's very risky and could allow anyone to login as you (hopefully no sites are doing this, but...)
Agreed! If they all worked like this would be a happy camper. Nothing worse than being in one browser, opening the email, then it opens and authenticates you on the default browser or even better on a different device and needing to forward the link to the other device so you can open it there (yes odd scenario but try not to access certain emails from certain devices).
Sites that send an OTP (crazy-pink-horse-3837) that you can copy, and paste is a good middle ground if implementing the link that just Auths the original request is too difficult.
where? i just went through Settings > Apps > Gmail on my iphone and found nothing about this. Likewise the in-app Settings in the GMail app lets you choose which browser is the "default app" but it's already set to Safari (the other options are Chrome, by Google, and ... Google, by Google). But that uses an embedded
Safari instance inside gmail, not the phone's Safari app.
To get what you want (links open in Safari.app, not the safari webview inside Gmail): configure your default browser in Settings (your iphone settings, not gmail's settings) to be Safari, and then in Gmail choose "Default browser app" instead of Safari.
It's super vague and unclear why things should work this way, and I don't know if this is forced on them by iOS or what. I'm trying to think of why choosing "Safari" in the gmail settings would use the webview instead of the app, and the most-charitable reason I can think of is that they don't want to contribute to the person having hundreds of Safari tabs open...?
Less-charitable reasons might include wanting to keep users in the gmail app for driving "engagement". I read somewhere that when apps use the in-app webview, the app dev can inject arbitrary javascript and thus has full control and can see keystrokes, what the webview's viewport is looking at, etc. I really don't think that's what google is trying to do here, though.
Wow - i even saw the words "default browser app" and did not even realize it was a setting choice. That works - thank you!
wrt reason : I think that the webview has cookie isolation from the actual app, so using the webview is a bit more privacy-protective. Google being Google that seems unlikely to be the motivating reason, but who knows what good may lurk in the heart of men...
If you have a newer-ish NVIDIA video card you can try ChatRTX. RTX30 or 40 and 8GB VRAM. Its not great but does allow you to point at a folder and is better than nothing. Does docs (txt, pdf, docx) and images (jpg, png, gif) but not at the same time.
https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/ai-on-rtx/chatrtx/
I use IntelliJ as my main coding tool but also use VSCode and Sublime text. If you have access to local LLMs or have an API key for some the Continue Plugin (basically Cursor but can use in IntelliJ) is the Best of the Best for IntelliJ (IMO). I have a box running some local models including Phind and StarCoder (plus some small embeddings) and have been super happy with the end product. The next up is Google Gemini Code Assist has been the best of the IntelliJ (non-configured) AI tools I have tried. There are better ones out there but IMO not for IntelliJ. It's still free for a few more weeks and I have been using it since the free release, fun to use. Can pre-prompt, say you are an expert XXX, please be funny, fill in the rest of your regular prompts. The Co-Pilot I use for work is very limited and will only answer coding questions. I tried to tell it that it was my coding buddy, and its name was Phil and told me it cannot have a personality or be funny. I believe the paid personal Co-Pilot allows you to choose which LLM it uses (I cannot confirm). The Phind VSCode plugin works really well. Also, the Phind coding models are on par with some of the other big ones and free if you have a subscription (or run locally). Sublime is around to open those GIG+ files as VSCode chocks and not worth the RAM of opening another IntelliJ.
Each task / programming language / query requires trying different LLM models and novel ways of prompting. If it's not work-related (or work pays for the one you use) sending as much of the code as relevant also helps the answers be more useful.
Most of the people I meet that say LLMs are not useful have only tried one (flavor / plugin), do not know how to pre-prompt or prompt, and do not give the tools a chance. Try one or two things, say yep, it's not good and give up.
Still hard for me to admit that Prompt Engineering is a profession, but it's the same as Google Fu. Once you learn it you can become an LLM Ninja!
I do not believe LLMs are coming for my job (just yet) but do believe they are going to be able to replace some people, are useful and those that do not use them will be at a disadvantage.
Hey @scyzoryk_xyz I laughed out loud and could understand the tongue in cheek sediment before the edits. When I was younger dreamed about becoming rich and buying a whole subdivision and moving my family and friends into the compound. Obviously, that was before I actually had a wife and children. Compromise is the only way relationships work with family and friends.
Good thing is you have more than enough HN Karma to burn so don't worry about the down votes, most people will get ‘it’ and gave you an upvote to offset the ones who did not.
Ended up with a karmic boost instead ¯\_( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)_/¯
Yeah I’ve made decisions to go back, but haven’t started a family. I’ve been curiously observing how much for those friends around me with kids friction against „society” is a whole thing.
Your commments are great, and made me lol, which is super rare - great insight, honestly... thanks
But if you've never had kids, you're missing out on so much. This is just my experience, and is how I "grew up" from 20-35. I didn't want kids, but now love them so much, and as 55 year old man, with a 21 and 20 year old that still live with me, I'm doing so well, and have been blessed by them being in my life, and my wife who wanted kids more than I did, lol.
I know you are probably aware of this, and it probably tears at you, in some way. I know it did for me. And your mission, if you choose to accept it is not to live life on your own terms, but on the terms of God (imho), your health, your wife, your kids (if you choose to have them), and ultimately in others, which once you perfect the previous, you will want to help others more than anyone else.
Not everyone has to have children of course, and in many ways it'd be easier if you didn't, but it sounds to me like your seeking new paths, and this is a life changer, imho, and something that every generation before you did, to have you, and bring YOU to life.
Not saying you’re wrong, but when people with kids say this, it means very little to me. Like of course you’re going to say that, otherwise you’d be admitting that having your kids was a mistake.
As mentioned in my parallel comment - the conundrum is that anybody advertising not having offspring is almost always going to sound shallow, immature, hedonistic to some extent. Like, nearly all arguments against having children feel sort of sad and lonely played out over the long term.
OTOH, anyone with kids would have to be some sort of psychopath to not argue for having them. Who the hell would believe another person’s existence can be a mistake? All my parent friends end up trying to convince me to have kids, and I don’t even put up any counter-arguments because damn - I really like their kids too. Even the ones who had them in the worst way imaginable!
I don’t think it’s merely about “admitting mistakes” - parenthood isn’t a restaurant menu option or consumer choice miscalculation you make. We are literally wired to love our offspring. We’re mammals - it’s not a logical decision. This whole breeding thing, it’s the strangest philosophical aspect of human nature.
The way I see it: if you can’t or if you don’t do kids, you better have some sort of conviction about what it is that you have to contribute. And it’s not about competition, being right, being smart - it’s about your own mental well-being. There is only so much fun to be had before you start to wonder.
I know this sounds like I’m arguing for having kids - I’m really not. I’m saying the decision not to do something can be just as profound against that absence. You just better have a plan for what it is you want to do with your time on Earth, when those mammalian instincts start kicking in.
Yeah, I’m somewhere in that window, and those thoughts are definitely emerging (I’m at 35 and SO is 33). This is blowing my mind, because I’ve been standing fast by the idea to not rush, to not force, to not push reality. But something is softening, not just in me but also in the SO.
I do appreciate you sharing the idea. It takes maturity to stop thinking only about your own terms, your own wants, your own needs. To take responsibility in one sense but to also accept your limitations. That bigger thing can be God.
Thank you for your kind words. The big question that is turning in my mind is if this is the only one path. Obviously, folks without kids don’t feel the urge to go around pushing others not to have them. And folks with kids love their children, so it’s not like they’re not going to want to share how profound it is for them. I used to perceive growing your family as this tedious chore, but I’m also starting to see how it can also be a wonderful gift.
It’s a big dilemma regardless. I just would not be sure whether to make the choice for my brood to live in a bunker commune surrounded by weapons, or whether to insert them into a world of skyscraper elite back-stabbing palace intrigue. On one hand I could ensure my blood mixes with that of our other apex predator families. But on another I could throw them into a doctrine of pain and suffering that grinds them into strength and perseverance. Decisions!
My partner and I had no intention of having children and we agreed on that. Eventually we moved in together and got married. We both had good jobs, traveled, ski / snowboard, hiked, camped, went to see everything we wanted to see. Long story short we stopped NOT trying to have kids (stopped all birth control) and never happened. Started the whole process of finding out who was the issue, and that was starting to add up quick in the expense department. We were about to start an even more expensive process when an opportunity presented itself that led to us adopting our first child. In less than a year we found out we had conceived one of our own. Sometimes it takes one to jump start the process, I guess. Even longer story short our relationship was starting to drift and then with our children we grew close again. Now we have two more best friends in our family. Coach their teams, host their parties, uber them around, and they are like having two more best friends that live with us. Going to be sad when they leave us but also super excited to be just the two of us again.
This goes to what you are saying about purpose in life. Without them I am not sure we would still be happy or even together. Children gave us a new reason to live and something to work on together. Life is no longer how the two of us can be happy but how we can make others happy, thus giving us pride to be happy ourselves. Strange to think about where we would be without them, but glad I only must speculate not actually know.
I grew up more remote with less opportunity for friends. My partner grew up in a densely populated area with lots of friends (my partner is way more socially adjusted than I am). The ones I made are the ones I still have while my partners are mostly gone and live elsewhere. We decided to raise our family in a large neighborhood with lots of friend opportunities as I feel that is the best way to let them experience life. Personally, I would love to be on 20 acres with my arsenal and survival gear, but that would not be fair to anyone in my family. We got the house with woods in the backyard (and a highway behind that) and both sides for a half acre in each direction, with close neighbors to the front. The rest of the neighborhood is house to house like any other. I need to be able to walk out my back door and take a leak if needed and be alone. While walking out the front provides the typical suburban experience. All comes back to compromise.
Whatever you decide, best of luck! Living the Mad Max lifestyle is hard to beat....
reply